With cell phones now as ubiquitous as
their land-line counterparts, few people worry about the
potential health risks associated with flipping open a handset
or standing near a cell phone tower.
But among researchers who study
the effects of electromagnetic emissions from cell phones and
towers, the prevailing wisdom is that it's too early to conclude
that they are harmless to humans.
"At the moment, there are too few
properly controlled scientific studies to draw any strong
conclusions," said Elaine Fox, a professor in the psychology
department at the University of Essex who is studying whether
the electromagnetic fields emitted from cell phone base
stations have a direct effect on human health.
Fox's project is one of several
that received funding last month from the United Kingdom's
Cell Telecommunications and
Health Research program, a group formed in 2001 to report on
whether exposure to cell phone radiation adversely affects
people's health. The group formed following the publication of a
report that failed to
find evidence of health risks, but noted that research to date
was not expansive enough to conclude that no dangers exist.
Topics of past research include
the potential link between brain tumors and cell phone use,
effects of cell phone radiation on blood pressure, and the
possible link between cancer incidence in early childhood and
proximity to cell phone base stations.
As part of the current studies,
researchers are examining the scientific basis of "electrical
sensitivity," a collection of symptoms, such as headaches and
fatigue, that some people believe is caused by exposure to
wireless phones and cell phone towers.
Fox's research, an extension of a
volunteer study that begun in January, will investigate whether
some people are particularly sensitive to cell phone
electromagnetic fields. In the first stage of the project, Fox
collected survey results from 4,000 participants, about 6
percent of whom indicated some degree of symptoms, such as
headaches or burning skin, that they attributed to
electromagnetic fields.
The second part of the project,
launched in November, involves testing people who identify
themselves as hypersensitive to electromagnetic fields alongside
people who are not, to establish whether cell phone base
stations really are affecting health and well-being.
Another research group, based at
King's College in London, is testing 120 people, half of whom
consider themselves hypersensitive to cell phone emissions.
James Rubin, a research fellow at King's College who is
overseeing the project, is hoping to submit findings for
publication by the end of next year, provided he finds enough
volunteers.
"People who report being
hypersensitive to mobiles are often understandably cautious
about taking part in a study which involves exposure to a
cell phone signal," he said. The study will examine whether
cell phone signals cause such symptoms as headaches, nausea,
dizziness and fatigue, and whether they affect the levels of
certain hormones that are important in regulating metabolism.
Since cell phone adoption reached
critical mass in the mid-1990s, research into the effects of
long-term cell phone usage has also become more feasible.
However, representatives of the cell phone industry say they
have yet to see any findings that should give cell users
reason for alarm.
"There is no conclusive evidence
that wireless phones contribute to health risks, and the same
goes for cell phone towers," said Erin McGee, a spokeswoman for the
Cellular Telecommunications
Industry Association.
The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration takes a
similar
position on health risks caused by cell phone base
stations.
"Measurements made near cellular
and PCS base-station antennas mounted on towers have confirmed
that ground-level exposures are typically thousands of times
less than the exposure limits adopted by the (Federal
Communications Commission)," the agency states on its website.
The FDA also
maintains
that there's no scientific evidence to link any health problems
to cell phone use. On the other hand, the agency says there is
no proof that they are absolutely safe.
The World Health Organization,
meanwhile, expects to complete health-risk assessments in 2007
under its
International EMF Project, which examines effects of
exposure to electric and magnetic fields up to 300 GHz in
frequency, which includes cellular-phone emissions.
Libby Kelly, executive director
of the Council on Wireless
Technology Impacts, an activist group favoring greater
regulation of electromagnetic emissions, believes health
agencies are understating the risks posed by wireless phones and
towers.
She cited a
study
released in October by Sweden's Karolinska Institute, which
found that 10 or more years of cell phone use increases the
risk of acoustic neuroma -- a benign tumor on the auditory
nerve. However, the study was conducted on analog cell phones
that had been in use for more than a decade, and researchers
said they could not say whether results would be similar after
long-term use of digital phones.